Not often I comment on news, but interesting article all the same. Avowed + Outer Worlds 2 didn’t meet sales targets. The PoE setting will continue but not likely to see Outer Worlds do the same. Which makes me ponder, why?

Avowed

I liked this game as it delivered a ton on nice beats in a decent IP. It had a fair chunk of accolades, available on a bunch of platforms, and had a really good post-launch buzz. It had a month’s head start on Clair Obscur. It peaked at 20,000 on SteamDB, which is slightly lower than PoE2. It was priced as a sort of premium game. Maybe the targets were too high?

Outer Worlds 2

This game is still on my wishlist, and frankly, it launched in the mess of other games that took my attention. There wasn’t much buzz here, at least as compared to the first game. You could get the first game, plus all DLC (Spacer’s Choice) for a damn good deal. It peaked at the same level as the original, which is the same as the other one. The price point though, what the flying fart?

Clair Obscur

This game was priced at 60% of Outer Worlds 2, and 40% of Avowed. It peaked at 7x the amount of both of the others. It was also, quite clearly, better than the others.

Game Industry

Over the past 2 years, about 30% of the US game industry has seen layoffs. That is a wild statistic. Sure, there’s the post-pandemic slump, but there are other factors. Sources of funds have dried up. Game companies are spending way too long making games, with less meaningful returns. Gamers are primarily spending their times in the same 10 game today as they did for the past 3 years (Roblox + Fortnite top that list). The lower end of gaming is chock full of slop that can’t be triaged (50 games launch each day on Steam), and the middle tier has to really do something amazing to get any buzz going. And you know, the whole “everything is more expensive and I need to chose between food and games” thing going on.

Point being, the market is saturated and there’s a limit to how much anything can actually sell in the current climate.

Steam

This is an important factor, one that has impacted the general psyche of gamers. Steam has a wishlist function and nearly every game goes on sale at some point. Some publishers will drop their price by 30% or more within a month (looking at you Ubisoft!), and very few games launch nowdays in a functional state. You are almost always better off waiting a week for a major kitchen sink patch before diving in.

The only reason to buy something now is a sense of FOMO, which is insanely hard to predict. On top of it, that FOMO has to compensate for the price of admission. For every Elden Ring, there are hundreds of other premium games with much less to offer.

Value

Which is the ultimate factor in any buying decision, which is arguably mostly perception. Sure, you can math this out on the aggregate, manage some trends, get the buzz, and ride a sweet spot that lasts a few days or weeks. My persona preference here is somewhat straightforward, and related to the relationship between price and content.

• $5 – Generally not much thought here, it needs some decent reviews and be between 2-10 hours of stuff.
• $10 – This is generally reserved for EA games, and in areas I have a gaming interest.
• $20 – My personal sweet spot, anything that has decent reviews and can keep me entertained for about 20 hours.
• $40 – This is reserved for AAA games on sale, so I tend to only spend this during the winter + summer sales.
• $60+ – Extremely rare that I will spend this much on a game, it has to be near perfect or a game I know I will devour. Clair Obscur for sure here. Monster Hunter Wilds too. Not much else!

I don’t think that Obsidian necessarily made a mistake here, their targets are clearly from Microsoft corporate who can’t seem to figure much out of late. Avowed is a solid game, Outer Worlds 2 seems to be as well. Neither are priced at a point where the perceived value is high enough to generate enough sales to meet some exec’s target. I’m hopeful some level of sanity gets applied here and a more realistic approach is used instead.

In the simplest of statements – make games that cost less.

The core of any factory game is, well, building a factory. StarRupture tweaks the model a bit.

Material to build a base is extremely simple. It’s a single item type, super easy to transport. If Satisfactory had this, it would be a 10/10 game for me.

Placing a building requires you to be consistent with the Z axis (height) and cannot float in the air (stability). This is the only factory game I know of with this restriction, and is a challenge I’ll explain later. Basically, this limitation restricts any creativity or mega bases.

Each base starts with a Base Core. It allows building in a square radius, in particular allowing mining buildings to be placed. It also has a max amount of building points that enables protection from the hourly fire waves. You can upgrade the core, but doing so triggers continual enemy waves, which have poor mechanics at this time. So, level 1 it is.

You can also build habitats, which protect you from fire waves, give a respawn point, allow personal crafting + research, and a few other bits. Easy to build, easy to stack. These are needed for exploration, acting as save points.

Each base needs power. Solar to start, and then wind later. Set it and forget it, which makes it a pointless mechanic currently. I’m sure it will change.

Right, now to the actual buildings.

• Smelters do what you think. They refine basic material. Simple ratios, standard output.
• Fabricators allow up to 2 inputs and make basic material. Furnaces allow 3, Mega Press allow 4.
• You’ll want storage buffers present, they are small enough in footprint.
• Cargo dispatchers send things to cargo receivers. Build the receiver first. Throughput here isn’t spectacular, but it works.
• Orbital Launchers send things to space in order to progress in content. Think simpler space elevators. It works well.

Rails though, rails are something else. They work in 3D and they clip, meaning they cannot overlap. There are 2 ranks currently, 120 & 240 items a minute. They are directional and can loop onto themselves. Importantly, the work on a pull mechanic, meaning they only have content on them if a building requires it. If rails are saturated (as you would with belts), you have some serious issues to work out.

Mega Base vs Mini Base

Scaling a base requires two things. Space to build and modularity (for re-use). Blueprints only add speed to the building process.

StarRupture doesn’t provide space, both due to the world terrain and base core limits. Oh, you can build a dedicated base to a level 8 item, but not to 2 of them.

Modularity is the next bit, in that a template needs to be applied. The issue here is rails. If you build a single rail to transport what you need (sort of a sushi belt), it will either get jammed with other requests, of generate a pile of spaghetti. If you build dedicated rails per input, for sure you are going to have clipping issues. 4 rails into a mega press… that takes up a crazy amount of space to build and requires so much clicking to make the vertical portion work.

Recall that in factory games add compounding amount of material requirements per level. Level 1 may need 10 things, level 8 requires 1,000. That means bigger factories. The end result is that you’re much better off building bases that are dedicated to level 6 items, which can be relatively compact. The challenge then is about inputs and outputs.

Ideally you use cargo shipping. It works well for advanced items, not so much for basic material (except helium, you need this for helium).

This model works well enough up to the world engine. Looking at the item tree past that… what seems to be the result is a massive amount of drones shipping material across the map. Curious how this work long term.

A bit further in. There appear to be 11 tiers currently, though only 8 are needed to reach the World Engine and the “end” of this version’s content. That’s about 20 hours or so.

A set of quick thoughts here, as there’s a sort of mixed bag train of thoughts.

The Good

• This is early access and the systems are generally simplified. It makes little sense to add complexity now, get a solid foundation first.
• The buildings + flow are a reasonable size and there aren’t 2 dozen of them. Effectively, you have 1 building per number of inputs, which is extremely nice to see.
• The world itself looks and feels great. Exploration is rewarding. The pre/post flare world changes are also solid.
• Material requirements for building are simplified, which is amazing! Imagine is Satisfactory didn’t require you to have 13 different items to build 1 thing, that’s here. It allows for base building anywhere with relative ease.
• There are only a few raw material types to build with – effectively iron, copper, clay and helium for a large portion. You’re not stuck with super complicate spaghetti trains.
• The movement + combat mechanics are generally responsive. You can double jump (2xspace) and dodge (left alt), which are not explained but essential for survival.
• Building extended bases is relatively easy. A shield tower costs peanuts, and it’s dirt cheap to build a shelter with 2 clicks.
• I like the idea of LEM (slot-in stat boosts), but the implementation feels wonky. The only ones that seem to matter now are +stamina. Would be neat to see this expanded.

The So-so

• Base defence is interesting as an idea, but poorly executed. I strongly recommend never upgrading a base as that causes regular waves of attacks.
• Moving items between bases becomes a requirement with helium. The tools to do so (cargo drones) can only be setup on the launch side, but need a target built ahead of time. This should be configurable from either end.
• Enemy spawns are annoying as the world layout breaks your line of sight but not theirs. Very annoying near the world engine where multiple ranged enemies will attack you and no real ability to respond.
• World traversal takes too long, and if you trigger enemies, they follow you for way too long. +Movement items are needed.
• Rails (a version of belts) can get wonky, requiring a restart. I like the concept of a pull mechanic… more on that in a bit.
• Base construction has a high dependency on the Z plane (vertical), in that it needs to touch the ground. If you’ve played Valheim where buildings fall apart if not on a solid foundation, see that same thing here. The concept is sound, but the tools present should allow you to build sufficient supports. Not the case. Which means very weird factory layouts.
• Collecting recipes requires significant exploration. There map is a sort of L shape and you start in the bottom left. There are duplicate recipes in either direction, but actually finding those recipes feels more like luck. I don’t mind the exploration, but would be nice to have a sort of hot/cold mini game to pinpoint the ones you want.
• Further to this, the only purpose of exploration is for a dozen or so recipes.
• While I don’t mind the size of weapon clips (for reloads), the ammo stacks are too small. 300 currently, should be 1000.
• Dying has you lose your weapon and items. If you died it’s 99% because of enemies and likely you will die during a corpse run. Creating a new weapon + ammo means you need to create storage boxes at every base. Meh.

The Bad

• Base defence in general when facing repetitive waves of enemies. I have a large dislike for PvE in my factory games, it disrupts the zen. I can manage it to a degree if the automated tools present can be configured to manage that threat. For now, I would hope they add a toggle to remove wave spawns until the defensive options are overhauled.
• Hunger / Thirst mechanics just don’t work here. They aren’t meaningful, the items you can produce are all worse than their raw ingredients, and provide no added game context. Having 12 different food items as raw ingredients counters the good of the game (simple).
• The amount of items that can be crafted as you progress is, well, concerning due to factory design challenges.

There is a ton of cool stuff here, and it’s different enough to bring some interesting ideas to the table. It addresses a ton of the issues present in the genre, both with simplicity and continual goals to work on. Tons of potential here.

I have a penchant for puzzle games, especially those that focus on deduction. TR-49 is from inkle, the same devs behind Heaven’s Vault. Both focus on language as the key puzzle component.

The principle interface is above. You have text on the left, and a code on the right. Through combinations of XX-## you navigate through what’s effectively a broken wikipedia, trying to restore the links. The main goal of the game is to wipe a particular record, and depending on your choice, there are multiple endings.

There are some automated note taking tools that help you deduce some pieces together, and milestones that let you know if you’ve hit a particular point. That adds a sort of boundary on the puzzle, which is key when you are presented with seemingly infinite options.

Each set of coordinates follows a particular pattern, which can be used to infer other links. The format always follows a XX=object and ##=date structure, it’s how they are intertwined that matters. The text itself may present something like ‘6 years before their death’, which gives a ## pivot for the same object. You can brute force the ## portion as it’s 100 choices if you’ve found an object code. There are other object codes that are used once, or coordinates that act for separate purposes.

While you’re solving this, there’s ongoing dialogue for the setting. It’s a weird setting and one that is best experienced fresh as it tightly bound to the multiple endings. This does add a lot of voice acting, where you will want to play with headphones in order to isolate the sound and truly focus on the puzzles.

The total journey isn’t exceptionally long, maybe 6 hours, but it is quite fulfilling. Well worth the purchase if you’re into this style of game, of which I am a HUGE fan.

I like factory builders and tend to give them all a shot. Mileage certainly varies here, with two main reasons. First, is that the math needs to friggin’ math. Ratios and scalability are key so that you can compartmentalize a factory. I’ve gone over this bit a lot, and was probably the only gripe I had with Techtonica.

Second is manageable and achievable goals. Making the numbers go up is an inherent goal, but the actual steps to get there are key. Satisfactory has milestones (good) and hard drives (bad). These goals have to be incrementally harder to reach and ensure there is no downtime where you’re just waiting for a ticker to complete. This is much harder said than done.

Comparables

StarRupture (why one word?) is a mix of multiple games in the genre. It’s a preset 3D map, with research that leverages usable products, and has some PvE against planet bugs, so a tad similar to Satisfactory here. It uses a grid structure for placement of stations, which is very nice.

In terms of differentiators, every hour or so, the planet receives a massive solar flare that burns everything that isn’t under a shielded protection. That giant fire causes the factory to stop working until it auto-cools and adds new things on the map. Cavern access is one, which doesn’t yet mean much that I can see. It also spawns some fireballs you can mine, which are only used in 1 recipe to date, as well as meteors you can harvest which allow you to build more bases. It also has hunger/hydration gauges, which are closer to Planer Crafter in nature. Somewhat uniquely, it doesn’t use belts but instead rails under a pull mechanism.

Rails

Worthy of it’s own point here, rails are functional connectors between buildings. If a building needs something and that something is connected to an available rail, it will traverse the entire map in order to meet that need. A rail is not dedicated to one item, as you can connect multiple together. Their only limit is throughput, which is generally only an issue at the ‘mouth’ of a factory. Since a rail only transports what is needed, you can have 1 rail supply 3 items to a factory without causing jams.

Factory Design

Resource collection can get a bit weird as the nodes are spread out – Helium 3 for sure. You’ll eventually unlock the ability to ship things between bases, which opens the door on a mega factory of sorts. World design requires foundations (which don’t always work), meaning you can’t cover the entire planet like you could in Satisfactory. Even the base shields you deploy have a hard limit on the number of buildings you can deploy (higher than you think mind you). I’ve ended up with sort of micro bases, where they harvest raw material, smelt it, then ship it to the larger base.

Research gates start off a buffet style where you will invest in 5 at the same time. Eventually, you will end up focusing on a specific research and dedicate everything to getting it done. Dedicated bases with shipping is key here.

The relatively great news is that actually building something requires 1 or 2 items total, no matter the complexity. This dramatically simplifies building more bases, or a quick shelter if a flare is coming up.

Early Access

I haven’t had any crashes, which is nice. The ratios generally work, and figuring out how to best use rails is a nice thing. Progress on research generally means you always have something to do and/or tweak. Exploration has progressive risk, with some areas feeling like death traps due to a combination of poor shooting controls (yes, guns) and a lack of combat options – standard EA issues.

Exploration is required to progress, as you need blueprints for research items, and Helium + Sulfur is nowhere close to where you start off. It’s certainly more enjoyable to explore than most 3D games.

There’s a decent sized list of QoL bit here, like how much research is needed for an upgrade, how maps work, how consumables work, and general factory design. But it’s all QoL items and not simply ‘broken’, which honestly speaks volumes to how the dev team took their time to launch something good. The major design risk here is going to be the rails and how they work at scale, time will tell. I feel like the potential here is higher than many others in the genre given the various bits at play here. To be clear, it’s only potential at this point – that’s the nature of EA.

Overall, I am impressed with what’s here. Well worth a pick up!

I am not one for New Year’s resolutions. Most of my reflective / change time is during the summer when things tend to slow down. Holiday season is often a mix of surviving / recovering / enjoying, not so much to make large scale changes. But that’s me.

Now, 2025 objectively sucked. I am fortunate enough to not be old enough that I don’t really have easy comparatives of bad years, though 2020 is a bar I would prefer to never reach again. 2026 is off to a rough start – at least on the world stage. It’d be cool to go a few days without some stupidly aggravating world event. Can we be cool for a bit?

Family stuff is straightforward for now. Enjoy the moments. Appreciate the moments. It certainly feels fleeting. Hockey is both a safe space and an outlet that the family can enjoy. That’s nice to have.

Health is improving but not great. Found some courage to try a modified exercise program that now let’s me wake up without backpain for the first time in.. hell, I don’t know when. I used to spend most days with a 4/10 of lower back pain, so this improvement is very welcome. Holiday eating habits were rough, so glad to get back to the standard routine.

Games coming up… well this is a weird one I guess. GTA6 may actually launch. Control 2 as well. Aside from that, not much on the radar I am paying attention to. If you look at the 2025 games in review post, there were only 3 big-name games there. I find I am gravitating much more towards the indie/middle pack games. Star Rupture (a sort of Satisfactory clone, in EA) is worth a poke. The commoditization of game dev, and frankly evolution of AI means that almost anyone can translate an idea into a decent game. The moral pitchforks of ‘no AI’ are the same we had in 1993 with Jurassic Park (animatronics vs CGI). It can’t be used everywhere (well, perhaps James Cameron has thoughts here) but it would be kind of moronic to not experiment some. The clear danger here, and it is a significant one, is that ‘people’ in general are idiots and self-serving. Social Media is the best example I can think of to showcase the stupidity of humandkind propelled by the quest-for-more-money of oligarchs. It’s not about doing more with less. It’s about doing more with the same.

I am sure that we’ll get some solid deliveries this year, likely a larger focus on portability where the Steam Deck and similar devices can truly start to shine through. It seems that is a more likely path forward given the RAM shortages around today. We’re still a few years from integrated graphics being fully viable. Close though!

I will point out I’ve done a recent replay of a few Final Fantasy games. More on that in a future post. For now, let’s just hope we have a decent 2025. Or at least a decent January 2025!